Whether they’re in your video games, on movie screens, or on your bookshelf, zombies have become especially prevalent in entertainment and popular culture in recent years. Unfortunately, creative thought has not kept up with this explosion of the genre, and many zombie storylines end up being redundant and monotonous. But author Jake Aurelian and his alter-ego Ripper the Clown are able to take an unconventional approach to the zombie genre in their newest novel, The Life & Mimes (& Zombie Apocalypse) of Ripper the Clown: The Autobiography of an Unconventional Zombie.
While traditional popular culture zombies have taken on the role of unintelligent, unintelligible rotting corpses with no aspirations beyond devouring human flesh, The Life & Mimes (& Zombie Apocalypse) dispels this stereotype, instead telling its story of an apocalypse from the perspective of a zombie. Unlike its predecessors, The Life & Mimes... introduces zombies with full mental capabilities, minimal cannibalistic tendencies and (almost) no slow, stunted saunter in sight.
In a happy coincidence unrelated to this book review, I recently got to sit down and talk with Aurelian. He shared how some of his comedy sets, by design, wouldn’t elicit an uproar from the crowd until the final ten percent of the show. Unbeknownst to his audience until the end, the individual punchlines served as the setup for the last, all-encompassing zinger. In reviewing Aurelian's book, I recognized something similar happened to me; I simply had to delve further into the story to realize how Ripper’s distinct writing style ties together throughout the novel to make my experience that much more enjoyable.
This was the case for a complaint I initially had: there is some seriously unrealistic shit that goes down in this book. But that’s fine — it is fiction, after all, and unrealistic things are supposed to happen, right? Well, kind of. It’s interesting to consider that when something is fully unrealistic (like walking, talking trees in The Lord of the Rings), the mind simply accepts it as truth and doesn’t question it. But when something is just realistic enough (i.e. killing a person) but has a touch of unrealism added to it (ditching the said murdered person for an eBay auction), the mind begins to demand some closure on the matter. This is exactly what happened to me. I didn’t question the resurrection of the dead, but I did freak out when Ripper killed Frank Cranks by running him over with his car and then chose to go home without doing anything about the body because there was “probably” some item ending soon on eBay. At first I rolled my eyes, criticizing the book for being too impractical. But soon enough I realized how hilarious that incident was precisely because of its absurdity (although I was also forced to momentarily question my own morality for laughing at the murder of a human being, albeit a nasty one like Frank Cranks).